Site.png

Scalabrini Centre of Cape Town and Another v Minister of Home Affairs and Others (CCT 126/25)

During May 2024 in the Western Cape High Court, the Scalabrini Centre of Cape Town challenged provisions under the Refugee Act 120 of 1998 that require asylum seekers to demonstrate “good cause” before being permitted to lodge claims of asylum at official ports of entry. Where asylum seekers could not demonstrate “good cause”, they were unable to file an asylum application and were at risk of unlawful arrest and detention.

HSF intervened as a friend of the court, highlighting the grave risks this system posed for children of asylum seekers. HSF’s argument was grounded in the statement by the Constitutional Court in in S v M [2007] ZACC 18, stating “the sins and traumas of fathers and mothers should not be visited upon their children.” Without proper safeguards, children faced the prospect of being deported, separated from their families, or rendered stateless due to the action of their parents.

In some cases, they could be returned to countries where they risked torture, human rights abuses, or forced recruitment into armed groups. HSF argued that these outcomes directly contravene South Africa’s obligations under its own Constitution and international conventions.